Proving your agent does what it should, before and after every model or prompt change.
An agent that queries data, fills in forms or acts on a user's behalf can't be validated by reading a few answers. You have to check its trajectory: which tool it chose, with which data, whether it stayed within its limits and whether it knew when to stop or ask for help.
I build and operate production agents in the in-house AI department of a European multinational, on Amazon Bedrock AgentCore, with enterprise identity and strict boundaries. My public agent has 138 automated tests, including adversarial cases.
A 2-3 week evaluation sprint, from €6,000. Your team keeps the harness, the metrics and the documentation.
Yes. I evaluate the agent's observable behaviour, whether it's LangGraph, a vendor SDK or custom code.
A documented, repeatable evaluation is useful evidence of control and oversight. It doesn't replace legal advice.